Omnisaura

Dinosaur genus

Vitakridrinda

Malkani 2004

Vitakridrinda is a dinosaur genus known from bones, found in rocks 72.2–66 million years old, in Pakistan.

Confidence labels
How sure are we?0 high8 medium2 lowHow we rate confidence

Confidence labels are switched off. Facts with low confidence, or where sources disagree, still carry a small dot: tap it for the reason.

At a glance

Data as of 11 October 2026
72.2–66 Ma
Triassic
Jurassic
Cretaceous
252 million years ago20114366

The last non-bird dinosaurs died out 66 million years ago. That's as far from us as the end of this bar.

Named by
Malkani 2004
disputedlow: PBDB and Wikidata agree on who named it but give years more than one apart; an editor has not ruled yet.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.

Described in
M. S. Malkani (2004). Saurischian dinosaurs from Late Cretaceous of Pakistan. In S. S. Hussain & H. D. Akbar (eds.), 5th Pakistan Geological Congress, Islamabad. National Geological Society of Pakistan, Pakistan Museum of Natural History (Pakistan Science Foundation): 71–73.
mediummedium: Only PBDB gives this; its author and year match the naming authority (Malkani 2004).
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. The publication the Paleobiology Database gives as the authority for this genus name, usually the one that first named and described it.

Lived
Maastrichtian, 72.2–66 million years ago
mediummedium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.
Omnisaura calculation72.2–66 million years ago, from its dated fossil records
mediummedium: Omnisaura's calculation from 8 confirmed PBDB records.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.

Fossils found in
Pakistan
mediummedium: Only PBDB records it (8 records).
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: Union of all sources (ISO 3166).

Rock formations
Vitakri
mediummedium: Only PBDB records it (8 records).
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: Canonical names, automatic and editor-approved matches applied.

Family
Vitakrisauridae
mediummedium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.

Parent group
Vitakrisaurinae
mediummedium: Only PBDB gives this; nothing contradicts it.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB leads.

Species named in its records
Vitakridrinda sulaimani
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database (the species its fossil records are identified as).

Diet
carnivore (inferred for its group)
mediummedium: Only PBDB gives this, and it infers it for the whole of Theropoda, the group this genus belongs to, not from this genus's own fossils.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB, inferred from a group the genus belongs to.

Way of life
ground dwelling, solitary (inferred for its group)
lowlow: PBDB infers this way of life for the whole of Theropoda; behaviour is rarely known for one genus.
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database. How it was chosen: PBDB, inferred from a group the genus belongs to.

Known from
Bones
Sources

Given by: Paleobiology Database (what the name was based on).

Sources: Paleobiology Database (CC BY 4.0), Wikidata (CC0 1.0)Confidence levels and gaps are Omnisaura's own assessment.

Gaps are answers

What isn't known yet

  • Type species: no source we use gives it yet.
  • Order: no source we use gives it yet.
  • Common names: no source we use gives it yet.
  • What it was named after: no source we use gives it yet.
  • Resting on one source: 4 facts come from a single source with nothing against them (rated medium): parent group (PBDB); family (PBDB); age (headline) (PBDB); diet (PBDB).

Size and appearance aren't covered yet, and diet and way of life only as PBDB infers them for the wider group. Omnisaura leaves the rest out rather than guess.

Where sources disagree

1 open

Authority

  • Malkani 2004PBDB (shown above)
  • M. Sadiq Malkani, 2006Wikidata

The sources agree on who named it but give different years. An editor hasn't ruled yet, so this is rated low until they do.

Did it meet…?

?

Same time, different places. Their fossils overlap in age, 72.2 to 66 million years ago, but no rock formation holds both.

Going by the ages and rock formations of their dated fossils, as on the map. Compare their fossil sites on the map.

Connections

Genera linked to Vitakridrinda by where and when their fossils were found, by classification and by who named them. Select a name to open its page.

Same rocks, same time 13

Genera found in the same rock units, from rocks of overlapping age, the most shared fossil sites first.

Same family: Vitakrisauridae 1

Other genera in Vitakrisauridae with a full profile.

Named by Malkani 12

Genera whose naming authority includes the same surname. The authority has no initials, so different people who share a surname can appear together.

Found in Pakistan 13

Other genera found in Pakistan, from rocks of overlapping age, the most fossil sites there first.

Credits

Where this page comes from

  • Paleobiology DatabaseCC BY 4.0 · fossil records, ages, classification
  • WikidataCC0 1.0 · names and identifiers
  • OmnisauraOmnisaura editorial · confidence levels and gaps
  • PaleoMAP PaleoCoastlines (Kocsis and Scotese 2021)CC BY 4.0 · ancient coastlines on the small map
  • Natural EarthPublic domain · today's coastlines

Pictures linked from this page are credited beside each one, with their own licences; the full list is in the JSON download.